Analyzing the Fictional Characters from Emily in Paris : The Pierre Cadault Case under Egyptian Law
Bad Faith and the Appropriation of Fictional Characters: The Pierre Cadault Case
Introduction
The intersection of intellectual property and fictional characters has given rise to complex legal disputes, as demonstrated in the recent case between Viacom International Inc. (Claimant) and Webtendances SASU (Defendant). This article examines the decision by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to declare the trademark registration of “Pierre Cadault” invalid, focusing on the key legal concepts of bad faith and unfair competition.
Background of the Case
The dispute revolves around the character Pierre Cadault, a fictional fashion designer from the popular Netflix series Emily in Paris. The defendant, Webtendances, registered “Pierre Cadault” as a European Union Trade Mark (EUTM) under several product categories related to fashion and luxury goods, including cosmetics, eyewear, and clothing.
Viacom argued that the registration of this trademark was in bad faith, intending to exploit the popularity of the character and the success of the series without authorization.
Fictional Characters and Intellectual Property Rights
The protection of fictional characters is a growing area in intellectual property law. Although characters like Pierre Cadault are fictional, they carry commercial value, often used in merchandising to promote a show. In this case, the registration of a trademark identical to the name of a well-known character created a risk of market confusion, leading the public to believe that the registered products were authorized spin-offs of the series.
The merchandising rights associated with such characters are critical for entertainment companies like Viacom, as these characters become valuable brands in their own right.
Unfair Competition and the Violation of Commercial Norms
The defendant’s use of the Pierre Cadault name was deemed to depart from honest business practices, constituting unfair competition. The character’s identity and association with high-end fashion were directly exploited through the product categories covered by the contested registration. Since luxury items like cosmetics, eyewear, and clothing are commonly licensed for merchandising, the defendant’s actions were likely intended to capitalize on the character’s image without legal authorization.
Case Outcome and Implications
The EUIPO Cancellation Division ruled in favor of Viacom, invalidating the registration under Article 59(1)(b) EUTMR. The decision highlighted the lack of legitimate intent on the part of Webtendances and concluded that the registration was made in bad faith. Additionally, Webtendances was ordered to bear the cancellation costs and legal expenses.
This case sets a significant precedent for intellectual property protection in the entertainment industry, reinforcing the need to safeguard fictional characters from unauthorized commercial use.
The stance of Egyptian law regarding the case
Protection of Fictional Characters Under Egyptian Law
Egyptian law explicitly protects literary and artistic works under Article 140 of Law No. 82 of 2002, which grants authors protection for a wide range of creative expressions. Although the law does not specifically mention fictional characters, many categories within Article 140—such as dramatic works, audiovisual works, and fine arts—encompass characters created in films, television series, and literary texts.
In the case of Pierre Cadault, the character is derived from the audiovisual work “Emily in Paris,” making him eligible for protection under Section (7) of Article 140. His distinct personality and connection to fashion also qualify him for protection under other forms of artistic expression, such as applied arts and designs in fashion, as implied in Section (11).
This wide-ranging protection aligns with the Egyptian law’s goal of safeguarding original creative works, ensuring that characters like Pierre Cadault, though fictional, cannot be commercially exploited without proper authorization from their creators.
Trademark Law: Bad Faith and Article 65 of Law No. 82 of 2002
Under Egyptian trademark law, trademarks registered with dishonest intent or those intended to exploit the reputation of another party’s mark may be declared invalid. Article 65 provides grounds for cancellation if a trademark was registered in bad faith.
How Lumin IP may contribute to safeguard your IPR
In light of increasing threats to intellectual property, Lumin IP is essential allies for creators and businesses. By providing comprehensive services—from trademark registration to legal enforcement—they help protect copyrighted works against infringement and ensure that fictional characters like Pierre Cadault remain the rightful property of their creators. As the landscape of intellectual property continues to evolve, having a dedicated partner like Lumin IP can make all the difference in safeguarding creative assets.
–Menna Amr, Oct.2024
Get in Touch
Let’s Protect Your Ideas